Poverty Porn: The misuse of images from the developing world

by The Ethical Volunteer

I grew up in a semi-rural area in Ireland, around 3km from the town of Bray. My parents worked fulltime and a neighbour looked after me as a child. The regional buses then, as now, were painfully unreliable and so many of my afternoons were taken up by walking to the supermarket in town and back. We were not the only ones making the trip by foot to the shops, there were others from my area that we would pass on the road. One lady in particular, Nancy, passed us everyday day. She was a compact little woman, full of energy and always seemed to be running to the shops for something. I was five years old and she was fifty, which made her a very old woman to me, and so it never ceased to amaze me just how fast she could walk. But there was nothing strange in the sight of a woman walking a 6km round trip to do her shopping. It was the Eighties in Ireland, cars were still a relative luxury.
A few months ago I was driving along the narrow roads to my parents’ house when I saw a small figure, bent double under the weight of shopping bags, struggling against the hill and the wind. I slowed down the car and rolled down the passenger window.
“Nancy, would you like a lift?”

“Oh! Oh, aren’t you very good”. Nancy brought the cold March air with her into the car and, though still out of breath, gave me an appreciative grin.

“”Oh! Oh, who’s car is this? Isn’t it lovely now? Is this your car? Aren’t you very lucky? A lovely car. And look at you, aren’t you only beautiful, a gorgeous looking girl, I bet all the boys are mad after you!”

“How are you doing Nancy, is it cold enough out there for you?”

“Ah its fierce cold isn’t it? It was a nice enough morning , but it’s supposed to get colder again now this evening. Long winter, long winter. And how are you, where are you these days?”

“I’m still in Ireland Nancy, I’ve been back two years now. Though I am heading back to Malawi next month for a few weeks”

“Are you! Lovely! What are you doing out there? I’d say its fierce hot out there anyway”

“It sure is Nancy, hotter than here anyway. We are just doing a bit of filming.”
“Isn’t that lovely? Where is it you said?”

Malawi, Nancy, its South East Africa?”

“Oh! Isn’t it terrible out there, the poor little guys, you see them on the telly, little babies with flies in their eyes, all sick and skinny and everything. God it’s terrible, the poor fellas. Do you ever see that thing, what do they call it, when the fingers fall off?”

I thought about that one for a moment as I turned right onto the hill where Nancy lived.

“Do you mean Leprosy Nancy?”

“That’s it! Do you see much of that. There was an ad on the telly, Trocaire or Goal or one of those, looking for money for those people, I was thinking of sending them something. Ah it’s terrible”

I wondered how far I should go with explaining what was wrong with those images Nancy was seeing so regularly on the television.

“Not really Nancy. I don’t think I’ve really seen a lot of Leprosy. I’m not even sure where you would have to go to find it. It’s not that common anyway, as far as I know. And they are not all that sick either, not all the children are dying or have flies around there faces. Most of the kids I know are quite happy and well looked after”

“Ah, but you see them on the tv all the time, and sure they look miserable”

I pulled the car up beside Nancy’s house. A rusted gate held up by a length of rope led the way to a small cottage half hidden by trees. The cottage is nestled into the corner of a couple of acres of farmland and a large electricity pylon, which was erected in the last twenty years, towers menacingly above the little house. She has lived there all her life with her sister. By all accounts the house is old, bordering on dilapidation, with the toilets still located in an outhouse at the back of the garden. Nancy’s sister hasn’t left the house in years and Nancy cares for her. They get by on a social welfare.

“Well don’t believe everything you see on the telly Nancy. Not everyone in Africa is miserable or starving or unhappy. Besides, it’s not like we are without our problems here”

“Oh, don’t start, sure they are looking for a tax for the house now! Where am I supposed to find that?”

With that, Nancy took her bags and almost took the door off the hinges as she slammed it shut behind her and turned her face towards the freshly falling rain.

I thought about Nancy over the coming weeks as I travelled Malawi and encountered much to be inspired by. Nancy’s image of the continent of Africa was extremely narrow and, in the grand scheme of things, wrong. Yet Nancy had made a very reasonable assumption from the information she has been given through the media: that everyone in Africa in poor, sick, starving, unhappy. “And they are the lucky ones” as one recent charity advert suggested. The message constantly relayed to the western audience is that Africa is a place of no hope, filled with helpless people, each country indistinguishable from the next with each and every pitiful black person incapable of looking after themselves. And with year after year of endless famines, wars and disasters beamed to us in the comfort of our living rooms, compassion fatigue sets in along with the largely unconsidered conviction that Africa is desperate and hopeless and has nothing to offer the world.

A Tanzanian friend of mine, a knowledgeable safari guide and successful business owner, recently accompanied his heavily pregnant Australian wife to her homeland to give birth to their first child. It was his first time to visit a “western” country, a dream-come-true for many Tanzanians that often equate moving overseas with success. He had left for Australia nervous but excited. He came back somewhat subdued. He told me how he had been shocked and offended by the Australians gross ignorance of his country. Questions such as “Do they have hospitals in Tanzania?” and “Is it very dangerous there?” along with the constant barrage of charity advertisements portraying Africa, and by association Tanzania, as a place of misery and hopelessness, had revealed to him the casual lack of respect and dignity afforded to his country and his people.

In some ways, the beliefs Richard encountered, the beliefs born of numerous similar images, bore an element of truth. By Australian standards, Tanzania is poor. More women die in childbirth in Tanzania than in Australia. With no social welfare system, more people live in dire poverty, grow sick and die of curable diseases or go hungry when the rains fail to come. Materially speaking, people have less and therefore when things go wrong, they can go really wrong. The typical image used during a fundraising drive aims to tell this story of pain and suffering, to convince the viewer of the vast need for immediate support. The images used in these campaigns are, therefore, framed in a way to convey the suffering and need. But the image is nothing without the framing.

In 2007 I visited Zanzibar with some Irish friends. We wandered around the markets of Stone Town as tourists tend to do, browsing through crafts and paintings. My friends took photos of the vibrant colours and streets so narrow you could touch the stone washed buildings that pushed and shoved each other for space along both sides. At one stall, a Muslim woman in multi-coloured robes was chatting to the owner as he worked on cobbling leather shoes. A young child, perhaps one years old, with chubby arms and hair bunched into little balls around her head, was fidgeting at her hip. Her mother smiled at me as I held out my arms to the child and, unconcerned, let me take her and walk about the stalls with her for a few minutes. The child was equally unconcerned, fascinated by my white skin (and probably my strange smell). She was very pretty and clearly a well-loved and cared for child. My friend took a photo before I handed her back and we moved on.

When my friends returned to Ireland they set up a fundraiser in support of the work my organisation was carrying out in a children’s centre in Northern Tanzania. ‘A picture tells a thousand words’ and my friends wanted people to give generously. They put together a poster with images from the time they had spent in Tanzania, along with pictures I had acquired during the previous year. They needed to tell a story: There once was a children’s centre in Tanzania filled with children that were sick, malnourished, desperate. Along came an organisation that wanted to help and began to buy food for the children, to build bedrooms, to install running water and electricity….. much had been done, but there was more to do.
To tell this story, they needed photos of sick, desperate looking children, of which there were many, along with more positive photos, ones that showed the progress at the centre and the new found good health and happiness of the children. My friend found the picture she had taken of me holding a plump, clean, contented looking baby and used this as the main image: Sarah, helping the poor children of Tanzania.

My friend meant no harm by using the photo she had taken in the market to represent a needy orphan. She needed a photo that could represent my story and the photo of the child in the market could be used to tell this story. And it worked, she raised money and my organisation, in turn, used those funds to support the needy children of the centre. But it was, in essence, a lie. A “white lie” as my Mum would say, but a lie none-the-less, and one that adds to the fear and misconceptions of life and poverty in Africa.

“The camera never lies” is a lie. It’s all about framing. It’s all about context.

What if the context had been a more joyful one? Well yes, that image could equally have been used in a story relaying the successful, fulfilled and joyful lives of Tanzanian people, but that was not the story being told. And unfortunately, it rarely is. Happy stories do not sell newspapers. Average people leading average lives are not of interest. Smiling babies do not often catch the eye.

It is the misuse of images that leads to the misunderstanding of African people and their lives and Richard is right to be offended on behalf of his nation. The ubiquitous, overused photograph of the helpless starving child represents Africa to the outside world as an infantile continent of peoples incapable of developing without western interference. It is patronising at best and can be dangerous. It robs a continent of their respect and dignity.
Unquestionably, there is poverty in Tanzania, but there is also opportunity. There is a lack of education but there is also an industrious, entrepreneurial spirit. There is hardship but there is also laughter and great joy. Unfortunately, the western world rarely gets to see all the sides of the story.

Had Richard met Nancy he may have been endeared, he may have been offended, he may have been amused. But I have a suspicion that the image of an old woman, living with her elderly infirmed sister, with no close-knit community around her for support, walking 6 km in the Irish winter to the shops and worrying about how to pay the new property tax would have filled my Tanzanian friend with sadness and pity, and possibly the feeling that though things may be bad at home from time to time, at least he was not an old woman living in Ireland.

by The Ethical Volunteer

“Bottom-Up” solutions in Mirale, Southern Blantyre

It’s rainy season here in Southern Malawi, which means it’s hunger season. The fruits of last year’s harvest are long gone while all around the hills of Mirale maize grows green, tall and tantalisingly just out of reach. It is a dangerous time of year. Those weakened by hunger are more susceptible to the diseases that flourish with the season and families struggle to carry their most vulnerable through these final few weeks of rains before harvest time rolls around once again. School attendance fluctuates; those that are well enough to walk to school may have their paths blocked by flash flood rivers or might be required to help their families repair rain-damaged homes.

Up until last year, the children of Chimwabvi village had one more challenge to face; the closest primary school was located 3km along a treacherous stretch of road (so dangerous that, in a country where road deaths equal deaths by Malaria, the police have a special road block for this particular stretch, attempting to improve its dismal safety record). The community, however, decided to try to do something to keep their children safe and applied to the government for funding to build a school within their village. Aware of the constraints on government resources, the community decided to prove their commitment to the project by building the bricks that would be needed for the facility out of the local soil. The government were indeed impressed by this initiative but unfortunately, until now, have been unable to supply any funding. The community, however, decided to go ahead with the school regardless of funding. Again, using local resources, they built a temporary classroom from blue gum timber poles and dried grass. Not much use in the rainy season, but an adequate shelter from the sun none-the-less. The school opened in September 2012 with 200 students. With little funding available, the community themselves have pooled together to contribute towards a salary for schools’ teachers. The contribution does not reach a liveable wage for the volunteer teachers, but at least it’s something.

While the government were unable to provide funding, the efforts of the community did not go unnoticed. Local business, Fisherman’s Rest, who are actively involved in community development, were impressed by this local initiative. So impressed in fact, that they offered to help the school by introducing a program to give each pupil one nutritious meal every day. The reasoning behind such an initiative is simple: feeding a child one solid meal per day reduces hunger and susceptibility to disease while encouraging higher school attendance. The children are not only healthier and therefore better able to apply themselves to their learning, but parents now have one less mouth to feed each morning. More learning, less sicknesses, less strain on limited family resources. Fisherman’s Rest provided the funding to buy the food and worked alongside the community to develop the program.

There are many arguments regarding aid and the creation of a dependency culture. The argument, in a nut shell, is that handing out aid reduces the recipients impetus to become self-sufficient. Fisherman’s Rest is concerned with this possible negative effect of fund giving and so initially provided the bare minimum needed to support the program. In response, the local community set up committees to oversee the construction of a temporary kitchen and the cooking and distribution of the food at the school. It would seem that this gift of aid empowered, rather than disincentivised, the local community. It is now two months into the feeding program and attendance at school has increased by twenty five percent. And that’s during the rainy season, a time when traditionally attendance would be expected to fall, not soar.

The community of Chimwabvi are responding to their own particular needs with initiative and enthusiasm. Their story, while not unfamiliar, is unique to them. It is by their own hard work that  the standard of living for the youth in their area is improving; it is their own effort that may result in the next generation being better equipped to deal with the challenges of life in Southern Malawi. And those challenges will keep coming. As of yet, Chimwabvi operate out of temporary classrooms while in a neighbouring village, a school that introduced meals for its pupils now faces the disturbing problem that the children are so motivated to reach school that they will cross rivers engorged by heavy rains to reach their daily meal, putting their lives at risk every time the rain falls.

The challenges will continue, but by using their own skills, initiative and hard work to tackle their unique set of problems, the people of Chimwabvi may well be the instrument of their own development.

 

*Spellcheck tells me that this disincentivised is not a real word. If it was not, it is now!

Leaflet for Trinity Volunteer Fair: Summary some of the most pressing ethical issues surrounding international volunteering.

The following is a leaflet we prepared for the Trinity Volunteer Day on the 22nd Nov. Its a quick summary of some of the most pressing ethical issues surrounding international volunteering…..

Volunteer Tourism is one of the fastest growing sectors of the tourism industry today. Each year, countless volunteers set off around the world to volunteer in developing countries, with the intention of “making a difference in the lives of those less fortunate”. Without doubt, most volunteers have the best of intentions. However, an unconsidered volunteer placement may cause more harm than good to the host community, ultimately hurting the very people the volunteer set out to help.

As with many aspects of tourism and aid, there are no straight answers. However, volunteers can reduce the potential of impacting negatively on the host community while increasing the benefits by considering the following before committing to a particular program or placement:

  • Does your placement primarily support the host community and economy or an intermediary organisation?
  • Do the activities of the host organisation address the needs of the host community? Be sure to gain a clear understanding of the purpose of the project and the volunteer placement in advance.
  • Can you add value to the project and avoid taking away potential employment from the local community?
  • What are your own expectations and motivations?
  • Have you familiarised yourself as best you can with the local culture, along with the historical and political factors around the issues your project seeks to address?
  • Are you satisfied that your volunteering does not encourage the potential exploitation of children?

Volunteering through a profit-focused Volunteer Placement Agency (VPA)

VPAs charge anything from 100 Euro to >3000 Euro to organise a one month volunteer placement. Approaching the higher end of the cost scale, a conflict of interest arises, as profits may well be the primary motivations of the agency. This draws into question the ethics of VPAs. Should these companies, predominantly located in the “West”, be profiteering from poverty? If they are not located “in-country”, might this mean reduced understanding of the needs, activities or policies of the projects they support?

Is the organisation addressing the needs of the host community?

Critics of VPAs suggest that, due to the profit-focused nature of their businesses, they are more concerned with the needs of their clients than with those of the host community. Projects may be established which do not address the most pressing needs of the host community and/or do not promote community involvement.  Without community ownership and vested interests, project sustainability is drawn into question. Even the extent to which the volunteer is welcomed by the community could be compromised.

 

In 2007, Voluntary Service Overseas UK stated that many “voluntourism” trips to developing countries are expensive, poorly planned and unlikely to help local people.  According to former director, Judith Brodie, VSO “are increasingly
concerned about the number of badly planned and supported schemes that are spurious. Some [voluntourism trips] ultimately benefit no one apart from the travel companies that organise them.” (Charity Attacks Gap Year Tourism, Reuters, 14 Aug 2007.)
The “Knight in Shining Armour” Complex

Volunteering has been labelled by some as neo-colonialism: unskilled westerners armed with a lack of understanding of local culture sailing off into the sunset to “make a difference” in two weeks. The idea of volunteers “changing the lives of others” may perpetuate the patronising image of those in need as childlike and helpless, waiting to be “saved” by the West. Volunteers should assess their motivations and expectations for volunteering. Undertaking a placement without reflecting on the relationship of the volunteer and host community may well add to a “North/South” divide.

Volunteering is primarily a cultural exchange. The volunteer is privileged to be allowed to participate in the activities of the host community and should approach their volunteer placement in the spirit of sharing, not saving.

Local Employment

Volunteers should consider whether they might inadvertently be taking the place of a local who would otherwise be employed to do the work.  For example, are you assisting a teacher or taking their place? A volunteer placement affects not only local economic development but the sustainability of the project. After all, if the volunteer is playing a vital role in the day to day activities of the project, what will happen once the volunteer leaves? The volunteer should be placed in a support role, ensuring they are an asset, not a necessity, to the development of the project.

Volunteer Placement = Exploitation?

As volunteer tourism increases in popularity there is a very real risk that the poor could become exploited to cater for this rising demand. One of the most worrying examples is that of children’s orphanages, particularly those which are unregulated. Oftentimes orphanages allow foreign tourists direct access to vulnerable children. The transitory nature of volunteer trips can add to a vulnerable child’s sense of abandonment and misuse while exposing them to all manner health and safety risks. Ask yourself: would we allow international tourists such access to at-risk Irish children?

These risks are highlighted by the dramatic rise in the numbers of unregulated orphanages in Cambodia in the last ten years.  This increase is in direct proportion to the rise in volunteer tourism, while statistics show that the vast majority of the 12,000 children currently housed in these facilities have at least one parent living. Friends International now run a campaign which is backed by UNICEF to end what they term “orphanage tourism”. See www.thinkchildsafe.org for further information.

Further  Reading and Resources:

The EthicalVolunteering.org website offers advice & information for people who are interested in international volunteering and want to make sure that what they do is of value to themselves and the people they work with.

GoodIntents.org supports philanthropic donors to make informed funding decisions. The website includes a guest article entitled “Voluntourism: What could go wrong when trying to do right”.

Voluntourism.org offers articles on research and opinions on the volunteer tourism industry.

Comhlámh offers support, advice and training for volunteers. See www.comlamh.org for more information.

 

 

This leaflet was originally prepared by V4F for the Trinity Volunteer Fair 2012. This annual event is run by the Trinity Volunteer Opportunities Forum and Civic Engagement Officer in the Careers Advisory Service.

Independent Volunteering with International Humanity Foundation

Planning to volunteer independently was a lot more difficult that I’d imagined. I wanted to volunteer, to put my skills to good use and to gain experience working for an NGO, but every search engine bought up the same results, and all of these results would cost me around a thousand pounds. Sometimes for only two weeks. Bizarrely it seemed you had to be really rich to be able to give your time to a good cause.

I happily stumbled upon the International Humanity Foundation (or IHF). With educational and orphanage centres for children in Thailand, Kenya and Indonesia, the charity is run entirely by volunteers. This is of course not without its struggles. But ultimately, everyone who runs and helps at the centre is dedicated to the children and looking after them. Why should it be that for the privilege of helping others you should have to spend hundreds of pounds or dollars or thousands of Thai baht? IHF’s successes lie in this – by not charging a ton of money for a glorified holiday, they must attract people with appropriate skills, who are serious about volunteering.

To begin with, each volunteer must participate in admin work before embarking on their volunteer abroad placement. This is in order to gain more knowledge of how the foundation works and indeed, to prove their commitment. And whilst at the centre, each volunteer must participate in 8 hours of work a day – four hours of administration work for the charity, such as advertising, marketing and financial work as well as four hours of local work, which ranges from teaching English, assisting the kids in their chores to maintaining the centre. Of course playing with the kids is important too! In short, my skills have been put to good use and, I would like to think, not just in the short term. In taking a part in many facets of the organization, each volunteer is played to their strengths. And the small amount of money we do pay, for food and accommodation, is in evidence well spent.

Let me take this opportunity to briefly talk about what IHF does – rest assured this isn’t PR, I’m just a volunteer with an unbiased but informed opinion. The centre in Chiang Rai, Thailand where I have been for a month now, houses 12 children who are all members of the Lahu tribe. The hill tribes of Thailand have always faced many challenges, as in the past they were not given Thai citizenship. IHF works hard to make sure that these children have an equal opportunity to other Thai citizens both now and later on in life.

I have volunteered through an agency, and independently. The latter is far superior in my opinion. Some may say it’s more of a risk, that an agency gives security in a foreign land, but it’s a risk worth taking if you’re serious about volunteering.

Written by: Jessica Wallis, a current volunteer with IHF.
www.ihfonline.org

Volunteering: Neo Colonialism or mutually beneficial cultural immersion?

The term “Neo –Colonialism” has been used quite frequently recently in relation to volunteering. Those that argue that volunteering is a new form of colonialism hold that the volunteer, self-serving, condescending, and lacking in any applicable skills or knowledge of the local culture, thinks nothing of sauntering off to Kenya or Cambodia with the arrogant notion that they can somehow “help”. This is the quintessential image of the volunteer; the gap year student, starry eyed and full of youthful confidence, inexperienced but “willing-to-try-anything”, indulging in the self-appointed mission to “make a big difference in the lives of the less fortunate while having a life changing experience”. Indeed, this image is perpetuated by the international volunteer-abroad agencies profiting from the patronising idea that the mere presence of the volunteer in the host community is somehow going to “make a big difference”. In this context the argument for volunteering as a form of Neo-Colonialism can certainly ring true.
However, how universal is this stereotype? Without a doubt, within the world of the fee-charging volunteer agencies it may be common enough to encounter this type of volunteer, but outside of this bubble I wonder is the volunteer not a little more conscientious? After all, voluntourism is no longer a new concept. For over a decade now, large scale international voluntourism has been taking place and while initially there may have been an underlying superiority in the attitude of the volunteer towards the host community, I would question the assumption that the majority of those that engage in volunteering these days (at least those outside of the pay-to-volunteer world) think that they are going to make a huge difference in the lives of those they will encounter during their work. I think there is a general shift in the global perception of volunteering from the antiquated view that volunteering is about going forth into the world to “help” to the more realistic view that volunteers are participating in cultural immersion, and while doing so endeavouring to assist those that are working to improve their own standards of living.
Not only is the attitude of the volunteer changing, but that of the host project also. From my experience working with grassroots projects, co-ordinators are becoming more aware of the limited ability of the volunteer to help with the long term development of the projects. There are, however, benefits to the host project from accepting a volunteer and these benefits are very similar, I would argue, to those of the volunteer. People sign up to volunteer primarily in order to immerse themselves in the rhythm of life of another culture, to understand how people in the developing world live, the struggles they face, the successes they enjoy, and hopefully to assist in any way possible in the development of their host organisation. The host organisation benefits from these interaction also, if only through exposure to the alternative views, beliefs, tolerances and experiences of the volunteer. If undertaking volunteer work is an act of colonialism, immersion of the volunteer within a very different culture surely helps to dispel any initial inadvertent feelings of superiority on the volunteers part and helps to spread understanding of world cultures on both sides.
There are countless statements on the internet declaring that volunteering is not an act of altruism and that it is the volunteer themselves who benefits more from the work they carry out than the host community. Both of these statements are true. And so? Does that mean that because the volunteer is benefiting from their period spent within a foreign community that it is somehow a shameful act of exploitation, as would be implied by the label “neo colonialist”? And even if the volunteer is the party that benefits most from this interaction, does this undermine any benefit that has been enjoyed by the host community?
There are negative consequences involved in an unconsidered undertaking of volunteering, however there are undoubtedly advantages on both sides too, if not for the development of the project, at least in the benefits derived from mutual understanding and sharing of skills and experiences. Perhaps the problem lies within the word itself: Volunteering. Maybe, instead, we could use the phrase “cultural immersion”. This would remove the possible patronising connotations and reflect more honestly the nature of the experience for both parts; the mutual benefits derived by the interactions between representatives of two very different cultures and peoples.

Volunteering abroad – avoiding the pitfalls and negative consequences (Part 1).

I have been reading many articles and forums recently that highlight the possible negative impacts of volunteering (or that are outright anti-volunteering). Much has been said in these international forums condemning voluntourism as new age colonialism and exploitation and, in many cases, what is being said is true, in one way or another. Personally, I have seen both positive and negative sides to volunteering and think that somewhere in between starry-eyed naivety and steadfast cynicism there is a healthier approach to volunteering and so I thought Id highlight some of the issues I’ve been reading and thinking about.

First, and in my opinion, most definitely foremost, is the issue of volunteering at an orphanage and as this is a pretty contentious and complicated issue I will dedicate this entry to that subject alone.

Possible negative impacts of volunteering at an orphanage:
In general, people sign up to volunteer with the best of intentions, hoping to be of benefit to their host community and project during their stay. However, as the old saying goes, “the road to hell was paved with good intentions” and there is a very real risk that an unconsidered undertaking of volunteer work may well end up having a negative effect on the very people the volunteer was hoping to assist. Good intentions are not always enough and for those researching different projects, it is important to bear a few things in mind.
By its nature, volunteering with vulnerable children at an orphanage may very well be the one area where the volunteer is most likely to run the risk of having a negative impact. Voluntourism has taken off in recent years, becoming hugely popular in choice destinations throughout the developing world in countries such as Cambodia, Kenya and India. As I have discussed at length before (more accurately; the very premise for this website…), voluntourism is a hugely profitable industry with agencies generating millions of euros in profit every year from fees charged to the volunteer. Agencies that are profit orientated are more concerned with addressing the needs of their client, the volunteer, than those of the host community they claim to be helping. In essence, the agency will respond to the interests of their clients and a significant proportion of those that contact these agencies, fed by media images of young white girls filling the emotional needs of love-deprived orphaned children, request a placement in a children’s home. For the agency, eager to book as many volunteers as possible, it is important to have many orphanages on their books to respond to this need. Indeed, the notion of working with needy children is so appealing that most of these agencies actively promote it, plastering pictures of grateful children and inspired volunteers all over their sites.

Where there is demand, supply is always near at hand, and where money is involved, the unscrupulous will follow…. The city of Siem Reap in Cambodia is one of the original, quintessential volunteer destinations: exotic, vibrant, beautiful and, in parts, desperately poor. Volunteers have been flocking into the city for more than a decade and many projects have benefitted financially from the donations from well-meaning but often-times naïve tourists and volunteers. One of the major consequences of this inflow of foreign donations has been that during the three year period from 2007 – 2010 the number of children’s homes in the Siem Reap province increased 65 per cent. A national study in the area, however, revealed that only one quarter of the children housed at these children’s homes had lost both parents. In many cases the children should not have been living at these homes, they should have been with their families. Attracting volunteers, however, means big business and in areas where people are desperately poor, “lending out” children to orphanage homes, with the promise of free food and access to education, can be very tempting for a struggling single or double parent family. And so more of these orphanages pop up, underfunded and struggling to provide for the many children in their care: the perfect project for the unsuspecting volunteer who wants to make a “big difference” while having a “life-changing experience”, and exactly what the agencies are looking for.

During their two week stint at an orphanage, the volunteer makes the all-important emotional connection with the children and sees just how far a few hundred Euros could go in to supporting these vulnerable and needy orphans. A few e-mails home and the money appears, handed over to the big-hearted project co-ordinator. This financial contribution, however, may be the very reason why the centre exists in the first place and the reason why the children are living there, rather than at home with their families. Maybe the volunteer sees their money being spent, maybe they are satisfied with the promise that it will be spent on supplies for the children, but very often once the volunteer goes, so do the supplies. After all, not only can the supplies be sold for hard cash, but keeping them may reduce the future capacity to fundraise, after-all its much easier to fundraise for a centre that’s desperately in need then one that’s relatively well stocked. This may sound cynical, but not only have I read many accounts from Cambodia, I have seen this happen myself in Tanzania. I have spoken to volunteers who have handed over money for beds at an impoverished centre. I knew, however, that the centre was run by an opportunist who was persuading parents to allow their children to stay at a centre for a few weeks in order to attract donations. I know of another headmistress who had three separate groups fundraising for the construction of the same classroom. Each group came to visit on separate occasions to see the results of their work, unaware that there were two other groups being shown the same classroom. At least the headmistress was just involved in straight out fraud, the “centre” however, was directly exploiting children to extract funds from foreigners.

There is another, potentially more dangerous, consequence of working with vulnerable children. Many agencies actively promote the development of short-term emotionally charged relationships between transient volunteers and vulnerable children, using sales pitches such as: “Make a big difference in the lives of some of Kenya’s poorest children in as little as two weeks! All you need is a big heart and a lot of love”. The idea that an unskilled inexperienced gap year student can somehow provide something that a disadvantaged and vulnerable child desperately needs is common in the pay-to-volunteer world. But think about it, would you feel comfortable with foreign travellers coming into your country and having free access to vulnerable children living in children’s centres? Of course not, the very idea is ludicrous, even to the utterly unqualified like myself it seems quite obvious that it wouldn’t be right to allow someone free access to at-risk children simply because they feel their presence there would help. Vulnerable children need stability, not brief encounters with foreigners where the child is showered with attention only to have it ripped away when the volunteer leaves and begin again with the appearance of the newest volunteer.

This topic could be discussed at length, but I think anyone who gives it due consideration will inherently understand that forming transient relationships with children who have been bereaved or abandoned in the past is not in the best interest of the child.

For many volunteers the idea of travelling abroad to work, live and play with some of the worlds most underprivileged children is a romantic one, but by participating in orphanage voluntourism the volunteer may inadvertently promote the development orphanages as businesses that exploit children and as a consequence have a negative impact on the very people they set out to help in the first place.

So, what to do to avoid having a detrimental effect on the lives of vulnerable children?
The answer is simple: Don’t volunteer with vulnerable children. Instead, chose projects that promote the safe development of children such as schools that benefit the poor, after school programs, youth clubs, soccer clubs etc. Or volunteer with adults with projects such as women’s groups, adult literacy programs, health care outreach educational programs – any program that does not run the risk of exploiting children. Choose programs that promote social development; programs which assist parents in becoming educated, employed or self sufficent and so be better able to provide for their children.

If you still intend, despite this, to volunteer with a children’s centre, then take steps to ensure you reduce the potential of impacting negatively on the lives of the children affected by the centre.
- Do not accept a role as a care giver nor form inappropriately intimate attachments with the children
- Try to assist the local staff in their roles and if possible impart any skills you may have to them so that the children can benefit in the long run from your volunteer work while not being damaged by your presence.
- Avoid donating cash or buying goods that can be easily resold. Instead pay for tangible assets that cannot be removed, such as sanitation facilities or cooking facilities.
- Do not pay for day to day running costs such as food, if the centre cannot cover its basics it probably shouldn’t be running in the first place and you should question its motives if it is not in a position to meet the basic needs of its children.

References:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/14/orphans-cambodia-aids-holidays-madonna

http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-195.phtml

Food for thought for the short term volunteer.

As voluntourism rises in popularity across the world, more and more people are signing up to short term volunteer projects abroad in the hopes of combining their holiday with the chance of giving something back to the global community. While most people have the best of intentions, many volunteers do not consider some of the basics before committing. Below are a few things the short term volunteer should consider before signing up to a project.

How much time do you have?

 

Very often people decide to combine travelling and volunteering, hoping to get a little of everything crammed into one month away. Almost without exception, you should not consider volunteering for anything less than two months. It takes time, and resources, for a volunteer to become familiar with a project to a point where they can be of any use. Those volunteering for shorter periods may well end up being of little practical use to the project or may, in fact, waste the time and resources of those involved in the running of the project.

Beware of projects or agencies that are willing to take volunteers for very short periods of time: Oftentimes agencies claim that the volunteer “can make a difference in as little as two weeks”. The volunteer should be very wary of any organisation or company willing to take volunteers for such short periods. Very often this is a clear indication that booking volunteers, and, therefore, making money, is the priority for the volunteer agent, rather than the progress of the project. It can be tempting for those looking for a two-week adventure to buy into the illusion of “helping while having a life changing experience” , but volunteers who are serious should ask themselves: can they be of help to a project in two weeks or are they merely a cash-cow, bringing in profits for the booking agent?

What are your expectations?

Many agencies sell the idea of the volunteer “making a huge difference in the lives of those less fortunate”. This is not only patronising but potentially damaging to the host project and community. Volunteers need to be honest regarding their reasons for volunteering and aware of their limited ability to make a difference.
Volunteering is not an act of altruism and those committing to a program should be honest with themselves regarding their motivations for volunteering. Volunteers are attracted as much by the adventure and the chance to be intimately involved with the local community as they are by the opportunity to offer some assistance to a project. The relationship with local community members is, therefore, one of give-and-take rather than one of grateful acceptance on behalf of the host community.

Volunteers should also be honest about their abilities and realistic in their expectations. Firstly, if you are not a trained teacher in your home country, is it reasonable that you should lead a class in the host country? Volunteers should not only be aware of their capabilities but also of their impact; it is more useful to the project if the volunteer assists the local teacher in their task, allowing classes to continue relatively undisturbed once the volunteer leaves, rather than taking a class only to have it abruptly end once the volunteers stint is over. Secondly, the volunteer should evaluate what kind of “difference” they are expecting to make. Too often volunteers, filled with images of “giving hope to the hopeless” arrive at their host projects only to be disappointed by how well they are run! Managing Hostel Hoff, I had volunteers say to me that they understood the project that they were working with was worthy and well run but because of this they didn’t feel useful enough, and so they moved on to work in orphanages that were in dire straits, teetering on the edge and barely able to keep running. They reasoned that if a project was in deep trouble, whatever help they could give would make more of an impact. Surely they were better off working alongside the orphanage co-ordinator try to find enough funds to buy food for the coming weeks than they were assisting a well-run centre in finalising child care policies? Here the volunteers could see the direct results of their work and were very satisfied with the contribution they had made in the short term. This assistance, however, only makes an impact in the very short term. The volunteer should question why, if a centre cannot even meet its basic running costs, is it open in the first place? I will deal with the subject of underfunded children’s centres in another blog, but for now make the point that volunteers should not be imperative to the existence of a project. If the volunteer wants to make a positive impact they should focus on helping existing local projects that have strategies and policies in place to ensure the long term development of the project and, therefore , the continued benefit to those whom the project supports. Making a subtle contribution to a well-run project is more beneficial in the long run than making a dramatic impact on a project that has no long term prospects and questionable management.

Of course there are many factors to consider before volunteering but those above are ideas that are often overlooked by the eager volunteer. Volunteers are not going to “change the world” in two months, nor should they. A realistic attitude towards volunteering not only improves the volunteers experience but that of the host community, and increases the chances of the volunteer making a positive impact during their stay.

“12% Off Volunteering!!” Agencies use of promotional language to sell volunteer opportunities.

Interested to know what my favourite volunteer agency are up to these days, I sent an enquiry email to i-to-i on behalf of Mary, a 22 year old woman with no applicable skills but an interest in volunteering for one month with young children in Moshi, Northern Tanzania. The initial reply that Mary received stated that if she signed up she could be “..working with a number of orphanages, nurseries and kindergartens in Moshi with children from disadvantaged backgrounds, these projects need your assistance to give them a better start in life”. Mary did not book immediately, however, instead taking her time to let this information soak in, weighing up the pro’s and coon’s and what-not. In the meantime, she began to receive updates from i-to-i on the wonderful, not-to-be-missed offers they have going on. The latest has the catchy and enticing title:

“12% off all projects and 12 reasons why volunteering will change your life”

Well there’s an offer if ever I saw one. This huge discount, by the way, from the company that states on their website that only 8% of the fee you pay ends up as profit/donations. Presumably, so, they are losing money by organising your volunteering. And if this commitment to the development of their projects wasn’t enough to have Mary reaching for the cheque book, they listed a bunch of reasons why volunteering will change her life.

Apparently, in this order:
1. Mary will have fun!
2. Mary will make a difference.
3. Mary will learn about herself.
4. Mary will learn new skills.
5. Mary will make new friends.
6. Mary will see the world properly.

Wow, Mary is truly going to have a ‘life-changing experience’. You may be forgiven for wondering if volunteering is going to help anyone but Mary, but not to worry because if you look closely you’ll see that point number two refers indirectly to the work she will be doing. Presumably they mean she will be making a positive contribution to a project and not just making a difference to i-to-i’s end of year profits, so that’s nice. Good to see the projects gets a mention too.

Update Sept 28th.

Mary just got another e-mail warning her of impending doom as the promotional price comes to and end……

“3 days left to save 12% – seize the day!”

“There are 12 really good reasons why volunteering abroad will simply be the best thing you ever did. So turn your ‘mañana, mañana’ into ‘carpe diem’ and just go for it!”

AAAHHHHHH!!!!! What to do! If only Mary had a spare 3000 Euro lying around!!!

And just incase you are wondering what the other six reasons for volunteering are, here you go:

7. You’ll do something extraordinary.
8. You’ll stand out with your newly bulging CV!
9. You’ll be recahrged.
10. You’ll see the world differently.
11. You’ll want to go back
12. You’ll be a different person.

So, no mention of the projects in there. Never mind, they got a mention in number two, so thats good enough.

Top Ten Things to look out for when choosing a volunteer agency/organisation.

Anyone who has spent time looking for a ‘volunteer abroad’ opportunity online will be only too aware that, while there are plenty of opportunities out there, many come with a hefty price tag. For many volunteers, these high costs can be as surprising as they are unfeasible. Not only can these high costs be prohibitive, however, but they can also create a conflict of interest. After all, if a volunteer agency is making large profits from fees paid by the volunteer, it stands to reason that their primary concern is not for the projects they assist but, first and foremost, their priority is to book new volunteers, ie, to make a higher profit. For the first-time volunteer it can be difficult to distinguish an organisation that genuinely does aim to assist with the development of grassroots projects vs. an agency whose primary focus is on profit. Below are ten things to look out for when choosing which organisation or agency to book through.
1. Do they charge more than 500 Euro for one months’ volunteering? If so, you must ask yourself if this is justifiable in comparison to the cost of living in-country.
2. Do they use promotional language and sales techniques, such as “Book now and get 20% off”. If so, the agency is most likely a company that is focused on profits, not projects.
3. Does the fee decrease with time in order to promote longer term volunteers or does it remain constant? If the fee does not reduce significantly after initial ‘administration costs’ have been covered then the volunteer should question this.
4. Can the agency give clear, current and specific information regarding the projects they support, proving that they take an active interest in their development or do they give general information which does not relate to a specific project?
5. Does the agency try to match your skill set with the needs of the project? If this is not a priority then profit may well be.
6. If the agency claims that some of their profits are donated, can they give exact figures as to how much money has been given to each individual project and account for how it has been spent? Organisations which are actively involved in the development of the projects they support should be able to list how, exactly, they have supported them.
7. Does the website make many references as to how much the volunteer, rather than the project, will benefit from your volunteering? If so, this would indicate the agency is more interested in booking a volunteer than in attracting the right volunteer to a project.
8. Is the organisation/agency connected to a tour or adventure operator and, therefore, stand to potentially increase their business from your volunteering through them?
9. Do they have offices based in-country or are they based in the west, and, therefore, all profits stay in the west?
10. Is there a cancellation policy, ie, can the volunteer get their money back if there is a problem once in country or are they bound to pay for the entire period to which they signed up to, even if they are no longer staying with the organisation and, therefore, no longer incurring any costs?

There are many resources online listing volunteer opportunities worldwide. Before making the final choice, the volunteer should be sure that it is truly the project, and not the ‘volunteer-overseas’ agency that are ultimately benefitting from their decision to volunteer abroad.

Volunteering Independently Vs. Booking Through An Agency.

If you are interested in volunteering, like 165000 others each month your first step may be to enter the words “volunteer abroad” into Google’s search engine. What you would be presented with is a myriad of volunteer agencies all promising you the volunteer vacation of a life time and all charging a pretty penny to do so. Costs for organising your trip through one of these companies can vary from 300 to 3000 Euro per month, but what are the actual advantages of volunteering through a company verses organising your trip independently? Let’s look at some of the common arguments put forth by these agencies for why volunteers are better off spending hundreds, if not thousands of euros, in fees:

Avoid the hassle of organising your own trip

Volunteer agencies are just this, agencies. Like all other agencies, they are the “middle man”. As such, they will organise most of the logistics of your trip once you have arrived at your destination country, including a pick up from the airport, accommodation and food at your volunteer house and there will be an agency representative who will escort you to a project on your first day and answer any questions you have. The representative will also assist you if any problems arise throughout your stay. Flights, insurance, vaccinations and visas are not included in the fee and must be organised by the volunteer themselves.

What are the alternatives, if you do not wish to use an agency to organise your trip? You can use various internet resources such as Volunteer South America or Volunteer 4 Africa to find a project that you are suited to and, once this has been arranged, contact local hotels or hostels to organise your accommodation, food and airport pickup. To make this a little easier you could also use online resources such as Volunteering for Free to find hostels that actively assist their guests with connecting to projects within their local town for no extra fee while arranging accommodation, food and airport pickups for their guests.

The volunteer simply needs to decide if the extra hassle incurred in organising their own trip is worth the hundreds or thousands of Euros saved in agency fees.

Agencies provide 24 hour support.

This usually means that the agency has an in-country representative who is on standby to assist volunteers day and night should they have a problem. However, most hotels or hostels will have a similar service, such as a receptionist, who is responsible for assisting guests if they have any problems.

By paying an agency you are covering all your expenses and so are not a burden on the local community.

You are also not a burden on the local community if you pay to stay at a local hostel, hotel or host family and by paying directly you will only pay a fraction of the fee the agency is charging.

Agencies only work with ‘verified’ projects, so the volunteer can be sure they working with a worthwhile project.

The fact that agencies charge a high fee creates a conflict of interest. The development of the projects where agencies place their volunteers is not the primary objective of the agency; getting more volunteers to book and, therefore, making more money is their primary objective. Agencies are not in a position to state that their projects are thoroughly legitimate as they are not an objective judge.

Reviewing objective analyses of projects online or contacting and assessing the project independently may be a better way of judging the value of a project to its local community .

Agencies ensure you will make best use of your time and that of the projects you support.

This would require agencies matching the skill set of their volunteers to a specific project before the volunteer arrives in the country. If the agency is dealing with upwards of thirty volunteers per location at any one time they would need to have a vigorous selection process in order to correctly match every volunteer with their placements, and so would need to turn away volunteers if a position is filled. Agencies do not turn away volunteers. In general, agencies book volunteers under categories such as Community Development or Women’s Empowerment and it is the job of the in-country representative to find the most suitable position for the volunteer upon arrival. If, however, there are many other volunteers interested in working in a similar area at that particular time there may not be enough skill-matched placements for everyone.

In contrast, independently contacting project co-ordinators and organising your own placement increases the chances that your skill set will be best matched and the project will benefit from your time with them.

Apart from avoiding the hassle of having to research and contact projects in advance and having to independently organise accommodation, food and transport, there seems little tangible advantage in using an agency to organise a volunteer trip and little to justify their huge fees.  On the other hand, volunteering independently gives the volunteer more control over their placement while paying directly for any expenses incurred, supporting local businesses and saving money in the process.